In what follows I will be able to give some historical background on the controversy and flesh out a number of the important issues surrounding the question “(What) can we learn from art?”
David Novitz points out that there are three basic varieties of knowledge claims we are able to make about the humanities, all of which are distinguished by their objects. the primary concerns what we claim to understand or believe about the work of art itself and whatever imaginary or fictional worlds could be connected thereto object. as an example, I can claim to grasp things about the way the sunshine reflects in Monet’s Water Lilies. I also can claim to understand things about Anna Karenina’s relationships together with her|along with her} husband and with her lover, Vronsky. Can my knowledge of Anna be meaningful, however, or be considered knowledge the least bit within the traditional sense (justified true belief) if Anna Karenina could be a non-referring name? Further, how can one’s interpretation of her situation be any longer legitimate than anyone else’s? Whether or not that very same reasonable validity is required also must be called into question.
The second reasonably knowledge claim we will make about art concerns what we all know or believe to be an appropriate or warranted emotional response to the artwork. One problem here, of course, concerns how it’s that we all know what reasonably response is suitable to a selected work. every so often, we seek advice from friends a few responses that they had to a specific work of art that was manifestly different from the one we had. How is it possible to evaluate which response is more appropriate or justified? Even suggesting that one should respond as if a unique, for instance, were to be taken as an account of true events, with responses following as if the events depicted therein were actually happening or had happened, doesn’t solve the matter. In addition, most novels don’t seem to be meant to be taken as true (despite the “report model” of emotive response.
The third quite a knowledge claim we will have about art concerns the type of data art can provide about the planet. It’s also widely acknowledged that art gives a specific degree of desiring to our lives. Art, and literature, specifically, can elicit new beliefs and even new knowledge about the globe. But the priority is this: fiction isn’t produced in an exceedingly way that’s reflective of the planet because it actually is.